King Arthurs Camelot Discovered

Discussion focused on the ancient European cultures ...

King Arthurs Camelot Discovered

Post Number:#1  Postby Alan Hassell » Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:40 pm

I was not going to post this here because of past experiences with a some undesireable individuals no names mentioned.
However you would get to know about it eventually so I might as well let the cat out of the bag.
Yes Camelot has been found and had some peole practised what I preached they might of found it instead of myself.

Amazing news Camelot has been discovered and the site is virtually intact. This could be the biggest discovery this century.

The discovery of the site was made by three intrepid historians and an internationally known Australian treasure hunter.

This now means that the area otherwise known as the Dark Ages will finally give up its secrets revealing much about how people lived worked and died in that Period.

Mallory when writing hi Morte d' Arthur describe Camelot as being a huge building constructed of white marble whcih was almost blinding when the sun was on it at the right angle.

The site found fits the description covers an area of 11 and half acres and has over 50 rooms that have never been touched or explored for over 1500 years.

This means that Camelot could hold the greatest collection of Dark Age treasures of gold, silver and coins in Britain.

The Finders, Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett have spent more than 70 years between them searching for King Arthur.

They were joined by Alan Hassell the Australian writer, treasure hunter who had been reseaching King Arthur since 1988.

Although, they knew about the site for many years they were put off from revealing the find earlier because of lack of evidence that the site was actually Camelot the Royal Palace of Kings.

Proving it would be a difficult if not impossible task because a Professor McAllistor did a small excavation on the site in 1888 during which 43 human remains were found together with the skeletons of three horses.

It was a huge room measuring about 60 x 50 feet and the walls originally had paintings on them and vast mosaics on the floor.

There was evidence that a huge fire had taken place which could of been signs of a battle that had taken place.

This really was the clue to what bought and end to this once marvellous building that became lost for centuries.

So on that description it would be something like the great palace at Fishbourne in Kent but on a much larger scale.

We know through documentation that it was originally built by a King Owain sometime around 150 AD.

Professor McAllistor had dated the site to around the time of Carausius otherwise known as King Crair 286-293 AD.

Because of this dating the finders were thrown off track and were unable to do much about it at the time so it got shelved.

That was until recently when someone wanted to date the bones recovered from the site. It was found that the original bones had become contaminated and fresh bones would need to be obtained in order to date the site correctly so a secret dig was done and the new bones carbon 14 dated.

The results were not what was expected because the new date put the site at the sixth century in fact 562 AD to be precise.

This is exactly the same date that a Comet is reported to have struck Britain which is documented as being on fire from one end to the other.

The Comet strike was confirmed by professors at Cardiff University and was also responsible for devastating Bolivia too at the same time before finally splashing down in the North Sea somewhere off the coast of Norway.

The strike is believed to be one hundred times more powerful than the Hiroshima A-Bomb when it hit.

Camelot was struck with such ferocity that it literally imploded on itself killing anything and everything inside leaving a virtual time capsule once it was finally discovered again.

So what proof do we have? When Alan Hassell was taken to the site the first time he noticed a great abundance of what he thought was white Quartz. Having spent many years on Australia's gold fields it caught his attention because if you find Quartz you might find Gold too.

There is a ditch running alongside the road which is full of this white rock but on close inspection it is not Quartz as expected but

Dressed and polished White Marble. It took four years for it to sink in how important the site actually is.

So if you want a little piece of British History and Camelot in particular feel free to take a look at the site yourself and grab a chunk or two of this beautiful stone.

Were not inviting everyone to vandalise the site which is on private property anyway but see this magnificent site for themseves before the powers to be protect it and stop anyone from going near it as will happen.

All Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett wanted to do originally was to open up Wales and develop a tourist industry that would create thousands of jobs and a thriving business.

The establishment did everything they could to discredit them in the past for some strange reason possibly greed.

Now finally they have given up and decided to finally reveal the truth about British History and why the establishment doesn't want it revealed.

Feel free to google this fabulous site and have a good look around there's plenty to see crop marks too.

We've even included a picture so you and find it yourself together with a picture of all that beautiful Marble just waiting to be collected.

Maybe Walt Disney would love to get hold of a prized bit of real estate in the U.K. where he could expose and have the real Camelot for tourists to finally gazed and wonder at.

The final picture is of what was the original story told on stone of the actual comet strilke which can be found in the Museum of London. Lettering on the side written in the old Coelbren alphabet describes the event.

For those wanting more information regarding the real history visit http://www.kingarthurslegacy.com/

also http://www.geocities.com/alanhassell.geo/index.html

you can Google it at 51 25 12 82 N 3 29 55 21 W

Why did I put it here? simple were not stupid having made it public knowledge is our way of telling the world we found it and as finders were entitled to any rewards. he who laughs last laughs longest hehe

No need for replies Im not interested in comments from Wannabee's
User avatar
Alan Hassell
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 6:00 pm

Re: King Arthurs Camelot Discovered

Post Number:#2  Postby Whyte Eagle » Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:02 pm

That will really be something if it turns out the way you say it is looking to be ... That GPS coordinate doesn't seem to be valid though ...
Image
User avatar
Whyte Eagle
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8447
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: Western US

Re: King Arthurs Camelot Discovered

Post Number:#3  Postby Alan Hassell » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:58 am

Image

Layer upon layer of dressed white marble so much of it that it can only be the remains of what was once the Palace of Kings as stated by Mallory and other writers.

Image

The stone found at St Pauls London showing the comets arrival

Image

Coelbren alphabet tells the story of the comet

Image

For those that have doubts heres all the proof we need
User avatar
Alan Hassell
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 6:00 pm

Re: King Arthurs Camelot Discovered

Post Number:#4  Postby WorkJay » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:52 am

Very cool discovery, Allan... thanks for posting it and do keep us informed of further developments...
User avatar
WorkJay
 
Posts: 1172
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: King Arthurs Camelot Discovered

Post Number:#5  Postby khumrytruth » Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:18 pm

I was very much hoping that something would have come of this fantastic discovery. Instead, Alan Wilson, and Baram Blackett have been driven underground.
Who are these people who would deny historical truth? Perhaps the same group who murdered Meriwether Lewis?

British History,the 652 comet, and the mass emigration from Britain at that time, makes a lot more sense, than the drivel that we have been fed for years. I agree that we have only learned these new facts since Alan Wilson, and Baram Blackett published all their research, but the evidence has always been there. It just needed the right people to put it together. I guess I should also thank that Australian guy, (what's his name?), who supported them, and spoke out when others did not have the guts.

But where are we now? I have studied Madoc for years, and read all the stories. I always disputed that it was Madoc 1170. That made no sense to me. Madoc 652 made more sense, and accounted for the time it would take, for the assimilation of the survivors into the local tribes. When Alan W and Baram B first went to USA, and examined the Bat Creek Stone, my hopes were raised about DNA comparisons. That went nowhere. Then the church at Llantwit Major, and the marble ruins. Where is that going?

There is no way that I am aware of, to contact Alan Wilson, as I have tried. I do not blame them for going underground. If you do not know your enemy, and your enemies are cowards, who hide their identity, what else can you do?

I respect all the research that Alan W, and Baram B. have done, and I agree with their theories. I did however, have a problem with one particular date. It may be just that I need to do more research. They state that St Peter’s super Montem Church, (which thankfully, they own), was built about 35-37 AD. Our branch of Christianity, which is based on Catholicism, but today comes in many flavours, did not start until about 380CE, which was 80 years later than Orthodox Christianity, but still 350 years later than the (apparent), building of St Peter’s super Montem Church. Now, if we throw Constantine into the mix, and he really started the Roman Catholics (First Council of Nicaea in 325), it gets worse. One of the oldest churches, (Ortodox), started by early Christians of Antioch, was built in the 3rd or 4th century. I mentioned Constantine, because he was a British Roman, and his mother, Helena was British.

So, if a lot of Christian churches were being built/getting started, after 300CE, St Peter’s super Montem Church would be the oldest in Christendom, and built before Christianity started, or a couple of years after the crucifixion. I am quite open to other opinions.
"The falsification of history has done more to impede human development than any one thing known to mankind" - Rousseau
User avatar
khumrytruth
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 10:17 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: King Arthurs Camelot Discovered

Post Number:#6  Postby khumrytruth » Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:23 pm

I should add, that an attempt was made to get a DNA profile, from the bones that were excavated at Bat Creek, but the Smithsonian, who has the bones, will not allow a sample to be taken. At least, that is my understanding. We know which side of the Truth Fence, the Smithsonian is on.
"The falsification of history has done more to impede human development than any one thing known to mankind" - Rousseau
User avatar
khumrytruth
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 10:17 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: King Arthurs Camelot Discovered

Post Number:#7  Postby hello_kitty » Fri May 23, 2014 10:36 am

So how this discovery finished?
User avatar
hello_kitty
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 11:07 am


Return to European

  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest